

B5 vs Tank 300
Denza · GWM
Head to head
Tank 300
Ultra PHEV
Wrangler
Rubicon Unlimited
From$60,990
From$90,972
Last updated July 2026
Most buyers should take the Tank 300 Ultra PHEV. It matches the Rubicon Unlimited's front and rear locking diffs and low-range gearing for about thirty thousand less, tows more, and covers you for longer. Choose the Wrangler if you want its far sharper approach angle, its disconnecting sway bar, and a roof that comes off.
14.9°
The Wrangler Rubicon Unlimited clears 43.9 degrees at the nose. The Tank 300 Ultra PHEV manages 29 with its side steps fitted, or 33 without them. Geometry is where the Jeep's premium actually goes.
Pick a priority — we’ll show the numbers that matter and tell you which car we’d choose.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
7 (leads) | Airbags | 6 |
Yes | Autonomous Emergency Braking | Yes |
Yes | Adaptive Cruise Control | Yes |
Yes | Blind Spot Monitor | Yes |
Yes | Rear Cross-Traffic Alert | Yes |
The starkest split on the page. The Tank 300 holds a five-star ANCAP rating scored in 2022, with 88 per cent adult and 89 per cent child occupant protection, and it runs to December 2028. Wranglers built from 1 January 2026 are unrated: the old three-star result expired in December 2025 and was never renewed. The JL launched here on one star before autonomous emergency braking lifted it to three.
Based on Safety, we’d pick the GWM Tank 300.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
300 kW (leads) | Power | 200 kW |
750 Nm (leads) | Torque | 400 Nm |
1,998 cc (leads) | Displacement | 1,995 cc |
4 | Cylinders | 4 |
1.9 L/100km (leads) | Fuel Economy | 10.2 L/100km |
300kW and 750Nm against 200kW and 400Nm. The Hi4-T plug-in hybrid does not edge this one, it wins it by half again on power and nearly double on torque, and it still runs a nine-speed automatic with a real low-range transfer case behind it. Australian reviewers came to respect the Rubicon's 2.0-litre turbo four after the V6 was dropped, but 400Nm is 400Nm.
Based on Performance, we’d pick the GWM Tank 300.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
12.3″ | Touchscreen | 12.3″ |
12.3″ (leads) | Digital Cluster | 7″ |
Yes | Apple CarPlay | Yes |
Yes | Android Auto | Yes |
Yes | Built-In Navigation | Yes |
A 12.3-inch instrument display against a seven-inch one, and a 360-degree camera the Wrangler does not offer at any grade. Both run a 12.3-inch centre touchscreen with Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and built-in navigation, so the real split is the driver's display and the cameras. Neither car has a head-up display. Neither cabin is the reason anyone buys either of them.
Based on Tech, we’d pick the GWM Tank 300.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
5 | Seats | 5 |
5 (leads) | Doors | 4 |
Five seats each, but only one holds a current safety rating, and that decides it. The Tank adds dual-zone climate with second-row vents, a 360-degree camera, and a 360-litre boot that opens to 1520 with the rear seats down. Australian reviewers describe the Wrangler's rear bench as somewhere to put people, not somewhere to enjoy sitting, and lane keep assist has never been offered on it.
Based on Family, we’d pick the GWM Tank 300.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
3,000 kg (leads) | Towing (braked) | 2,495 kg |
6,261 kg (leads) | GCM | 4,819 kg |
The GWM Tank 300 has more room for the stuff of life. If boot space and flexibility are your priority, this is the one.
Based on Storage, we’d pick the GWM Tank 300.
| GWM Tank 300 | vsspecification | Jeep Wrangler |
|---|---|---|
224 mm | Ground Clearance | 255 mm (leads) |
800 mm (leads) | Wading Depth | 760 mm |
29° | Approach Angle | 43.9° (leads) |
25° | Departure Angle | 37° (leads) |
23° (leads) | Breakover Angle | 22.6° |
12 m | Turning Circle | 11.8 m (leads) |
3,000 kg (leads) | Towing (braked) | 2,495 kg |
Lockers and low range are a dead heat, so this comes down to geometry and gearing. The Rubicon clears 43.9 degrees at the nose to the Tank's 29 with its side steps fitted, 37 at the rear to 25, and sits 255mm up against 224mm. It drops its front sway bar for articulation and crawls at 77.2:1. The Tank matches neither, and no amount of torque substitutes for either.
Based on Off-road, we’d pick the Jeep Wrangler.
Pick a priority above to see how the GWM Tank 300 and Jeep Wrangler stack up on what matters to you.
The Tank 300's nose is where the footnote lives. Upright and slab-sided, it clears 29 degrees exactly as it sits on the showroom floor, side steps and all. Take the steps off and it finds 33. The 18-inch two-tone alloys and the chrome are doing identity work the hardware underneath never asked for, and the 360-degree camera behind that grille is one the Jeep cannot match at any grade.
Short overhang, exposed tow hooks, a flat upright screen and 43.9 degrees of nothing under the bumper. The Rubicon's front end is shaped entirely by what it is for, which is why it looks like this and why it clears what it clears. The seven-slot grille is close to the only part of this car doing purely decorative work, and even it is shaped by the bumper it sits above.
Images are illustrative and digitally rendered. They may not reflect the exact variant, colour or trim. Details →
The GWM Tank 300 tows 505 kg more than the Jeep Wrangler. Hitched at their maximums, the GWM Tank 300 keeps 140 kg more payload.
3,000 kg
Braked towing2,495 kg
610 kg
Payload420 kg
310 kg
Payload at max tow170 kg
GVM
Limit that bites firstGVM
Not published
Max ball weight250 kg
Assuming 10 per cent of the trailer weight.
Two adults plus luggage is roughly 400 kg.
GWM Tank 300 Ultra PHEV
Over a limit. This combination does not comply.
Tow rating
505 kg under the 3,000 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
Over GVM by 40 kg. Lighten the load or the ball.
Combined GCM
751 kg spare across the whole combination
Tow ball limit
No published limit. Vans usually need 8 to 12 per cent of ATM on the ball.
Jeep Wrangler Rubicon Unlimited
Over a limit. This combination does not comply.
Tow rating
0 kg under the 2,495 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
Over GVM by 230 kg. Lighten the load or the ball.
Combined GCM
Over GCM by 230 kg. Trailer and load cannot both stay.
Tow ball limit
0 kg under the 250 kg ball limit
Manufacturer maximums; the compliance plate of your exact vehicle governs. Ball weight assumed at 10 per cent where unpublished; kerb or payload calculated where the maker omits one. Check any car against your van with the towing calculator.
Start with the claim the price gap says cannot be true.
The Rubicon Unlimited answers with the last ten per cent, and it charges for it.
By Yuri Cartland, Editor
Opinions are our own.
You tow, and gross combination mass matters more to you than the badge on the grille. You want both diffs to lock and the transfer case to have a real low range, and you have worked out that this one does. You would sooner spend thirty thousand on the trip, the tyres and the drawers than on approach angle you will use twice a year. Seven years of unlimited-kilometre cover closes it.
Explore the Tank 300The track is the destination, not the road to the campsite. You want the front sway bar to drop out of the way, 43.9 degrees of clearance at the nose, and 77.2:1 of crawl gearing doing the work at walking pace. You want the roof off at the top of the hill. You have seen the ANCAP situation and decided you can live with it. Nothing else in this pair does any of that.
Explore the Wrangler