

Defender vs Patrol
Land Rover · Nissan
Head to head
Wrangler
Rubicon
Defender
110 S D250
From$90,972
From$115,242
Last updated July 2026
$24,270
The Jeep Wrangler is $90,972 and the Land Rover Defender is $115,242 as picked here, a $24,270 gap (prices as of July 2026). Step up or down either range and the gap moves with you.
Pick a priority — we’ll show the numbers that matter and tell you which car we’d choose.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
6 | Airbags | 6 |
Yes | Autonomous Emergency Braking | Yes |
Yes | Adaptive Cruise Control | Yes |
Yes | Blind Spot Monitor | Yes |
Yes | Rear Cross-Traffic Alert | Yes |
The Defender wins this decisively. It holds a five-star ANCAP rating tested in 2020, still current, where the Wrangler is unrated: its old three-star result, itself an upgrade from one star, expired at the end of 2025. The Wrangler runs just six airbags and its last assessment flagged structural weaknesses. Both have AEB and blind-spot monitoring, but on crash protection the Defender is far ahead.
Based on Safety, we’d pick the Land Rover Defender.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
200 kW (leads) | Power | 183 kW |
400 Nm | Torque | 570 Nm (leads) |
1,995 cc | Displacement | 2,997 cc (leads) |
4 | Cylinders | 6 (leads) |
10.2 L/100km | Fuel Economy | 8.1 L/100km (leads) |
The Wrangler takes the sprint, narrowly. Its 2.0-litre turbo petrol makes 200kW to the Defender diesel's 183kW, and being lighter it claims 7.9 seconds to 100km/h against 8.3. But the Defender's 570Nm of diesel torque dwarfs the Jeep's 400Nm, which matters more for towing and low-down pull. So the Wrangler wins on paper pace and power; the Defender on the torque that a heavy 4WD actually uses.
Based on Performance, we’d pick the Jeep Wrangler.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
12.3″ | Touchscreen | 13.1″ (leads) |
7″ | Digital Cluster | 12.4″ (leads) |
Yes | Apple CarPlay | Yes |
Yes | Android Auto | Yes |
Yes | Built-In Navigation | Yes |
The Defender edges the cabin technology. Its 13.1-inch touchscreen and Pivi Pro system outsize and out-feature the Wrangler's 12.3-inch Uconnect setup, and its digital instrumentation is more sophisticated. Both cover Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and a reversing camera, and the Wrangler answers with a punchy nine-speaker Alpine stereo. But on screens and connectivity the newer Land Rover interface is the more polished.
Based on Tech, we’d pick the Land Rover Defender.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
5 | Seats | 5 |
4 | Doors | 5 (leads) |
The Defender is the better family choice by a wide margin. Both seat five, but the Defender adds a bigger 972-litre boot, a smoother ride, a five-star rating and a more usable cabin, where the Wrangler's cargo bay is modest and its cabin compromised by its off-road focus. The Wrangler's open-air roof is fun, but for carrying people and gear the Defender is the sensible pick.
Based on Family, we’d pick the Land Rover Defender.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
2,495 kg | Towing (braked) | 3,500 kg (leads) |
4,819 kg | GCM | 6,700 kg (leads) |
The Defender wins on cargo. Its 972-litre boot behind the second row dwarfs the Wrangler's modest load bay, and its longer, wider body swallows luggage and touring gear the Jeep cannot. The Wrangler's boxy shape and removable roof trade outright space for character. For hauling family gear or a full touring load, the Defender is comfortably the more practical of the two.
Based on Storage, we’d pick the Land Rover Defender.
| Jeep Wrangler | vsspecification | Land Rover Defender |
|---|---|---|
255 mm | Ground Clearance | 293 mm (leads) |
760 mm | Wading Depth | 900 mm (leads) |
43.9° (leads) | Approach Angle | 37.6° |
37° | Departure Angle | 42° (leads) |
22.6° | Breakover Angle | 27.9° (leads) |
11.8 m (leads) | Turning Circle | 12.84 m |
2,495 kg | Towing (braked) | 3,500 kg (leads) |
The Wrangler is the more single-minded off-roader. It brings Tru-Lok front and rear locking differentials, an electronic sway-bar disconnect, a 4:1 transfer case with a 77.2:1 crawl ratio, live axles and a 43.9-degree approach angle no Defender matches, plus a roof and doors that come off. The Defender counters with a steeper departure angle, deeper wading and air suspension for versatile touring. For hardcore rock work, the Jeep leads.
Based on Off-road, we’d pick the Jeep Wrangler.
Pick a priority above to see how the Jeep Wrangler and Land Rover Defender stack up on what matters to you.
The Wrangler wears the most recognisable face in off-roading: the seven-slot grille, round headlights and flat, upright screen that have defined the Jeep for decades. In Rubicon trim it adds chunky all-terrain tyres, red tow hooks and a purposeful stance. Nothing signals intent like it, and the removable doors and roof mean the whole thing can open to the elements. It looks like exactly what it is, a trail machine first.
The Defender's front is unmistakable but understated next to the Jeep: a near-square grille, round LED lamps and a flat bonnet that reference the classic Defender without mimicking it. In entry 110 S trim the detailing is plainer than the pricier grades, yet the shape still looks premium and deliberate. Against the Wrangler's raw, iconic face, the Land Rover's is the more designed and grown-up of the two.
Images are illustrative and digitally rendered. They may not reflect the exact variant, colour or trim. Details →
The Land Rover Defender tows 1,005 kg more than the Jeep Wrangler. Hitched at their maximums, the Land Rover Defender keeps 244 kg more payload.
2,495 kg
Braked towing3,500 kg
420 kg
Payload764 kg
170 kg
Payload at max tow414 kg
GVM
Limit that bites firstGVM
250 kg
Max ball weight350 kg
Assuming 10 per cent of the trailer weight.
Two adults plus luggage is roughly 400 kg.
Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
Over a limit. This combination does not comply.
Tow rating
0 kg under the 2,495 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
Over GVM by 230 kg. Lighten the load or the ball.
Combined GCM
Over GCM by 230 kg. Trailer and load cannot both stay.
Tow ball limit
0 kg under the 250 kg ball limit
Land Rover Defender 110 S D250
Fits within every published limit.
Tow rating
1,005 kg under the 3,500 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
114 kg spare after the ball weight and your load
Combined GCM
1,369 kg spare across the whole combination
Tow ball limit
100 kg under the 350 kg ball limit
Manufacturer maximums; the compliance plate of your exact vehicle governs. Ball weight assumed at 10 per cent where unpublished; kerb or payload calculated where the maker omits one. Check any car against your van with the towing calculator.
The Wrangler Rubicon Unlimited is the cheapest and most single-minded off-roader here, and that is the whole point.
The Defender 110 S is the entry to its own range, and it still costs tens of thousands more than the flagship Wrangler, so the case for it rests on refinement.
By Yuri Cartland, Editor
Opinions are our own.
Maximum factory off-road hardware, open-air character and the lower price matter more to you than a safety rating or on-road refinement. You want the front and rear diff locks, the sway-bar disconnect, the 77.2:1 crawl ratio and the 43.9-degree approach angle, plus a roof and doors that come off, and you accept the unrated safety, the thirsty petrol and the firm ride to have them for far less money.
Explore the WranglerA five-star safety rating, refinement, diesel efficiency and 3500kg towing matter more to you than extreme off-road hardware or the lower price. You want the torquey inline-six diesel, the independent-suspension ride, the bigger boot, the 13.1-inch screen and five years of roadside, plus the breadth to daily and tour, and you will pay tens of thousands more than the flagship Wrangler to have it.
Explore the DefenderSee the full Jeep Wrangler vs Land Rover Defender model comparison.