

Everest vs Prado
Ford · Toyota
Head to head
Everest
MU-X
From$60,000
From$49,900
Last updated July 2026
6.4L
Base for base, the Isuzu MU-X's 2.2-litre diesel claims 6.4 litres per 100km against the Ford Everest's 7.1, and both still tow the full 3,500kg braked.
Pick a priority — we’ll show the numbers that matter and tell you which car we’d choose.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
9 (leads) | Airbags | 8 |
Yes | Autonomous Emergency Braking | Yes |
Yes | Adaptive Cruise Control | Yes |
Yes | Lane Keep Assist | Yes |
Yes | Blind Spot Monitor | Yes |
Yes | Rear Cross-Traffic Alert | Yes |
Yes | Pedestrian Detection | Yes |
No | Driver Attention Monitor | Yes (leads) |
Yes | Auto High Beam | Yes |
Yes | Reversing Camera | Yes |
Yes | 360° Camera | Yes |
Yes | Front Parking Sensors | Yes |
Yes | Rear Parking Sensors | Yes |
Yes | Daytime Running Lights | Yes |
Yes | Front Fog Lights | Yes |
Yes | Auto Headlights | Yes |
Yes | Rain-Sensing Wipers | Yes |
Both hold a five-star ANCAP rating dated 2022 and valid to the end of 2028, each rated alongside its ute sibling. The Everest scores higher on the sub-tests, 93 per cent child occupant protection to 85 and 74 per cent for vulnerable road users to 69, and adds a ninth airbag. Adult protection ties at 86 per cent, and both run lane-keep and autonomous emergency braking as standard.
Based on Safety, we’d pick the Ford Everest.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
125 kW (leads) | Power | 120 kW |
405 Nm (leads) | Torque | 400 Nm |
1,996 cc | Displacement | 2,164 cc (leads) |
4 | Cylinders | 4 |
7.1 L/100km | Fuel Economy | 6.4 L/100km (leads) |
The Everest is the only one here offered with a V6, its 3.0-litre diesel making 184kW and 600Nm against the MU-X's four-cylinder ceiling of 140kW and 450Nm. Lower down the pair are close, the Everest's 2.0 on 125kW to the MU-X's improved 2.2 on 120kW. For outright grunt and towing ease the Ford wins; for commuting either base four does the job.
Based on Performance, we’d pick the Ford Everest.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
12″ (leads) | Touchscreen | 8″ |
8″ (leads) | Digital Cluster | 4.2″ |
Yes | Apple CarPlay | Yes |
Yes (leads) | Wireless Apple CarPlay | No |
Yes | Android Auto | Yes |
Yes (leads) | Wireless Android Auto | No |
Yes | Bluetooth | Yes |
Yes | DAB+ Digital Radio | Yes |
Yes | Built-In Navigation | Yes |
Yes (leads) | Wireless Phone Charging | No |
No | Head-Up Display | No |
Yes | Heated Front Seats | Yes |
Yes (leads) | Ventilated Front Seats | No |
Yes (leads) | Heated Steering Wheel | No |
No | Heated Mirrors | Yes (leads) |
No | Rear Climate Control | Yes (leads) |
Yes | Rear Air Vents | Yes |
Yes | Push-Button Start | Yes |
Yes | Keyless Entry | Yes |
Yes | Auto-Folding Mirrors | Yes |
Yes | Selectable Drive Modes | Yes |
Yes | Ambient Lighting | Yes |
Yes | Privacy Glass | Yes |
Yes | Power Tailgate | Yes |
The Everest carries the more modern cabin, a 12-inch touchscreen and an 8-inch digital cluster against the MU-X's 8-inch screen and small 4.2-inch dial display, plus dual-zone climate and keyless entry the base Isuzu does without. The MU-X's 2025 update finally brought back physical volume and tuning controls and a larger screen on the top grades, but the Ford still reads as the newer design.
Based on Tech, we’d pick the Ford Everest.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
5 | Seats | 7 (leads) |
5 | Doors | 5 |
898 L (leads) | Boot Space | 311 L |
1,823 L | Boot (folded) | 2,138 L (leads) |
No | Rear Climate Control | Yes (leads) |
Yes | Rear Air Vents | Yes |
Yes | Privacy Glass | Yes |
A genuine split. The MU-X seats seven in every grade and undercuts on price, which is much of its family appeal, while the Everest seats seven in all but the five-seat base Active. The Everest is wider inside, more refined on the long haul and stronger on the ANCAP child-protection score. The Isuzu answers with standard seven seats, the longer warranty and a lower entry price for the same three rows.
A genuine tie.
Both cars handle familyequally well — this one’s a draw.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
898 L (leads) | Boot (seats up) | 311 L |
1,823 L | Boot (seats folded) | 2,138 L (leads) |
855 kg (leads) | Payload | 705 kg |
3,500 kg | Towing (braked) | 3,500 kg |
6,250 kg (leads) | GCM | 5,900 kg |
Yes | Roof Rails | Yes |
Yes | Power Tailgate | Yes |
No | Factory Towbar | No |
Hard to separate cleanly, because the quoted boot figures sit in different seat configurations. The MU-X holds more with its rear rows folded, around 2138 litres to the Everest's 1823, while the Everest carries more behind its second row and is the wider load bay. Behind a full third row both are modest. For maximum flat-folded cargo the Isuzu edges it, for everyday five-seat space the Ford does.
A genuine tie.
Both cars handle storageequally well — this one’s a draw.
| Ford Everest | vsspecification | Isuzu MU-X |
|---|---|---|
229 mm | Ground Clearance | 230 mm (leads) |
800 mm | Wading Depth | 800 mm |
30.4° (leads) | Approach Angle | 23.4° |
25.3° | Departure Angle | 27.6° (leads) |
22.2° (leads) | Breakover Angle | 19.1° |
11.8 m | Turning Circle | 11.6 m (leads) |
3,500 kg | Towing (braked) | 3,500 kg |
Yes | Selectable Drive Modes | Yes |
No | Factory Towbar | No |
A close draw. The Everest brings the better approach angle at 30.4 degrees, a rear diff lock, terrain modes and a purpose-built Tremor grade for the hard stuff. The MU-X counters with a better departure angle, part-time dual-range 4x4 and a rear diff lock, and reviewers rate it properly capable for the class. Clearance is level near 230mm, so the Ford edges the extremes and the Isuzu covers most tracks for less.
A genuine tie.
Both cars handle off-roadequally well — this one’s a draw.
Pick a priority above to see how the Ford Everest and Isuzu MU-X stack up on what matters to you.
The Everest wears the widest, most modern face in this pair, a broad grille framed by C-clamp LED headlights that tie it visually to the Ranger it shares a platform with. The MY26.5 update kept the look current without reinventing it, and the result reads as the more premium, more car-like nose of the two. That matches how it drives, and it is the one that looks most at home in a school car park.
The MU-X's front is squarer and more traditional, updated in the 2025 facelift with a bolder grille and reshaped lights but still unmistakably utilitarian. It looks tougher and plainer than the Everest, function placed ahead of fashion. The face suits the value pitch, honest and hard-wearing rather than trying to out-style the newer Ford, and it is the more workmanlike of the two by some margin.
Images are illustrative and digitally rendered. They may not reflect the exact variant, colour or trim. Details →
Both are rated to tow 3,500 kg braked. Hitched at their maximums, the Ford Everest keeps 190 kg more payload.
3,500 kg
Braked towing3,500 kg
855 kg
Payload715 kg
505 kg
Payload at max tow315 kg
GVM
Limit that bites firstGCM
350 kg
Max ball weight350 kg
Assuming 10 per cent of the trailer weight.
Two adults plus luggage is roughly 400 kg.
Ford Everest Active 2.0L Turbo Diesel AWD
Fits within every published limit.
Tow rating
0 kg under the 3,500 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
105 kg spare after the ball weight and your load
Combined GCM
105 kg spare across the whole combination
Tow ball limit
0 kg under the 350 kg ball limit
Isuzu MU-X LS-M 2.2L Turbo Diesel 4WD
Over a limit. This combination does not comply.
Tow rating
0 kg under the 3,500 kg braked rating
Vehicle GVM
Over GVM by 35 kg. Lighten the load or the ball.
Combined GCM
Over GCM by 85 kg. Trailer and load cannot both stay.
Tow ball limit
0 kg under the 350 kg ball limit
Manufacturer maximums; the compliance plate of your exact vehicle governs. Ball weight assumed at 10 per cent where unpublished; kerb or payload calculated where the maker omits one. Check any car against your van with the towing calculator.
The Everest is the truck the mid-size 7-seat class is measured against, and the reviews are near-unanimous on why: it drives like a car.
The MU-X's pitch is value, and it is a strong one.
By Yuri Cartland, Editor
Opinions are our own.
On-road refinement and cabin tech matter to you, you want the V6's 184kW and 600Nm or simply the option of it, and you value the ride reviewers rate best-in-class for the long family trips. You are comfortable paying more up front and stepping past the five-seat base Active, and you would rather have the cheaper servicing than the longer warranty.
Explore the EverestThe lowest price into a genuine seven-seat 3500kg-braked diesel is the priority, and the six-year warranty plus standard seven-year roadside cover matter more to you than cabin polish or outright refinement. You cover most of your kilometres under 150,000, you can live with a plainer and noisier cabin, and you would rather bank the several-thousand-dollar saving than pay for the newer Ford's on-road manners.
Explore the MU-X